MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1927697615 · doi:10.1111/jvs.12345

Contrasting lineage‐specific patterns conceal community phylogenetic structure in larger clades

2015· article· en· W1927697615 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tammy L. Elliott, Marcia J. Waterway, T. Jonathan Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vegetation Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersW. Garfield Weston FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsCladeBiologyPhylogenetic treeLineage (genetic)CarexCyperaceaeEcologyEvolutionary biologyNichePhylogeneticsPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Question Community phylogenetic approaches can provide information on the ecological forces structuring plant community composition. For example, assuming evolutionary conservatism of ecological traits, environmental filtering has been suggested to result in phylogenetic clustering, whereas competition has been suggested to lead to phylogenetic over‐dispersion. However, current approaches report aggregate community‐wide metrics and typically assume that all lineages respond similarly. Here, we question this assumption and evaluate evidence for lineage‐specific patterns of co‐occurrence. Location Eastern Canadian subarctic. Methods We use a novel individual‐based, neighbourhood approach to evaluate lineage‐specific co‐occurrence patterns among 35 focal species of Cyperaceae (sedges). Cyperaceae is a species‐rich clade, with many species sharing similar niche preferences and environmental tolerances, making this a model clade for evaluating interspecific interaction strengths. Results We reveal striking differences in co‐occurrence patterns between clades. Within the Cyperaceae, the two species of the genus Trichophorum tended to cluster with each other, whereas species within Eriophorum co‐occurred more often with less closely related neighbours. These contrasting patterns repeated themselves within Carex , with species in the Core Carex clade more often co‐occurring with close relatives, while phylogenetic over‐dispersion was more prominent in the Vignea clade. As a consequence of these opposing lineage‐specific relationships, the overall phylogenetic structure of sedge communities appears random. Conclusions We show opposing lineage‐specific patterns in phylogenetic structure that are obscured when species are aggregated into larger clades. Our results reveal cryptic complexities in plant community assembly across taxonomic scales, and indicate that different plant lineages may vary in their response to community‐level processes. We suggest that the processes underlying community composition can be better understood by using alternative sampling and analytical approaches combined with thoughtfully‐created null models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vegetation ScienceSame topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207