MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Functions of Fate Schema: The Case of Persian and English

2011· article· en· W1928593130 on OpenAlex
Salva Shirinbakhsh, Abbass Eslami-Rasekh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchema (genetic algorithms)Intercultural communicationCross-cultural communicationCultural knowledgeSociologyHumanitiesPsychologyLinguisticsArtAnthropologyComputer sciencePhilosophyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With an aim to contribute to the present knowledge of intercultural communications, this study explores the cultural schemas of ghesmat and fate in Persian and English societies. Particularly, it tries to demonstrate how comparable these two cultural schemas are across the speakers of the two speech communities. Data were collected by triangulation, through ethnographic observations, movies, and websites. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. To perform a quantitative analysis the frequency of the schema of fate and ghesmat in different situations in English and Persian was calculated. Furthermore, to find out the underlying themes of the schemas activation a qualitative content analysis and Wierzbicka’s semantic analysis were employed. The findings further improve the cultural knowledge involved in intercultural communications and discuss the sociocultural roles of ghesmat and fate cultural schemas in the speech communities. Key words : Schema; Cultural Schema; Ghesmat; Fate; Cultural Keywords; Intercultural Communication Resume: Dans le but de contribuer a la connaissance actuelle des communications interculturelles, cette etude explore les schemas culturels de ghesmat et le destin dans les societes persane et anglaise. En particulier, il essaie de montrer a quel point ces deux schemas culturels sont comparables a travers les locuteurs de ces deux communautes linguistiques. Les donnees ont ete recueillies par une triangulation, c'est-a-dire a travers des observations ethnographiques, des films et des sites web. Les donnees recueillies ont ete analysees qualitativement et quantitativement. Pour effectuer une analyse quantitative, la frequence du schema du destin et de ghesmat dans de differentes situations en anglais et en persan a ete calculee. D'ailleurs, afin de trouver des themes sous-jacents de l'activation des schemas, une analyse qualitative de contenu et l'analyse semantique de Wierzbicka ont ete employees. Les resultats ameliorent davantage les connaissances culturelles impliquees dans les communications interculturelles et discutent des roles socioculturels de ghesmat et des schemas de destin culturels dans les communautes de la parole. Mots-cles: Schema; Schema Culturel; Ghesmat; Destin; Mots-Cles Culturels; Communication Interculturelle

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it