MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1928662553 · doi:10.4319/lom.2012.10.736

Improved estimation of carbon fixation rates from active flourometry using spectral fluorescence in light‐limited environments

2012· article· en· W1928662553 on OpenAlexafffund
Greg M. Silsbe, Robert E. Hecky, Ralph E. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography Methods · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotosynthesisPhotosystem IICarbon fixationQuantum yieldFluorescenceChlorophyll fluorescenceBiological systemChemistryBotanyBiologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bio‐optical models predict photosynthetic electron transport rates through photosystem II (ETR PSII ) from measures of irradiance (E), the absorption coefficient of pigments associated with PSII (a PSII ) that are spectrally scaled to E (a̅ PSII ), and the quantum efficiency of PSII (ϕ′ PSII ). However bio‐optical models currently suffer from methodological uncertainties in the quantification of a̅ PSII , and variable stoichiometry between ETR PSII and the more ecologically‐relevant carbon fixation (P C ), defined here as the quantum requirement for carbon fixation (Φ e,C = ETR PSII × P C −1 ). Here we analyze measures of P C , ϕ′ PSII , and a̅ PSII across optical, thermal, nutrient and phytoplankton composition gradients in Lake Erie. We show that ϕ′ PSII in the light‐limited portion of the water column is relatively constant despite the wide range of biological and environmental conditions, but that variations in a̅ PSII are large. Measures of a̅ PSII are shown to be highly influenced by methodology as different approaches significantly influence measures of ETR PSII and Φ e,C . A new technique that derives a̅ PSII from in situ spectral fluorescence measures is introduced and shown to yield ETR PSII estimates that correlate well with independent measures of P C under light limited conditions. The Φ e,C inferred from this new approach agreed well with independent assessments in the lake and demonstrates that bio‐optical models with well‐parameterized a̅ PSII can be usefully predictive of light‐limited P C across wide biological and chemical gradients in this great lake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and Oceanography MethodsSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207