MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low incidence of colorectal cancer in Australian ulcerative colitis patients

2012· article· en· W1929034325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian P. Selinger, Jane M. Andrews, Andrew Titman, Rupert W. Leong

Bibliographic record

VenueAdelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisIncidence (geometry)Colorectal cancerInternal medicineSigmoidoscopyGastroenterologyCancerColonoscopyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) causes significant morbidity and patients may ultimately require colectomy. UC is also associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), which may be as high as 18% after 30 years although some recent studies have reported lower rates. Aims: This study aimed to ascertain the cumulative incidences of colectomy and CRC in Australian UC patients. Methods: The study is based on a prevalence cohort (1977–1992) of Sydney IBD patients was fi rst described in 1995 and longitudinally followed. UC patients were included in this analysis if they were either diagnosed after 1977 or had yet to experience colectomy or CRC in 1977 Cumulative incidences for colectomy and CRC were calculated by competing risk survival analysis using the statistical software R. Phenotyping was performed using the Montreal Classification. The influence of extent of colitis, sex, age at diagnosis and year of diagnosis on cumulative incidences were also examined. Results: 504 patients (267 males, median age at diagnosis 34 years) were followed up for a median of 14 years (8006 patient years). The cumulative incidence of colectomy was 15% (95% CI 11%–19%) after 10 years, 26% (95% CI 21%–30%) after 20 years and 31% (95% CI 25–36%) by 30 years. Pancolitis was associated with an increased risk of colectomy (hazard ratio of 13.15; 95% CI 3.2–54.01, P < 0.001), but neither age at diagnosis nor year of diagnosis influenced colectomy risk. CRC occurred in 24 patients for a cumulative incidence of CRC of 1% (95% CI 0–2%) at 10 years, 3% (95% CI 1–5%) at 20 years and 7% (95% CI 4%–10%) at 30 years. Patients diagnosed before 1980 had a hazard ratio for CRC of 5.2 (95% CI 1.74–15.5, P = 0.003) compared to those diagnosed ≥1980. The extent of colitis (left-sided versus pancolitis) was not found to influence CRC risk possibly due the small number of cancers (P = 0.8).Conclusion: We have demonstrated a very low incidence of CRC in this Australian cohort of UC patients. The decreased risk of developing CRC in patients diagnosed after 1980 suggests a positive effect from modern management by dedicated gastroenterologists. The finding of lower cancer rates than in other cohorts should reassure patients and physicians alike. Only a quarter of patients required colectomy within 20 years and the risk was higher for patients with pancolitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)Same topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207