MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1929111327 · doi:10.1071/bt15022

Differences in seedling water-stress response of two co-occurring Banksia species

2015· article· en· W1929111327 on OpenAlexaff
Meisha Holloway‐Phillips, Huyin Huai, Anne Cochrane, Adrienne B. Nicotra

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Botany · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDepartment of Environment and Conservation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBanksiaBiologyPopulationProteaceaeSeedlingRevegetationDrought toleranceXylemTranspirationBotanyEcologyAgronomyPhotosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the South-west Australian Floristic Region, timing of rainfall is critical for successful seedling establishment, as is surviving the first year’s summer drought for population persistence. Predictions of a warmer, drier future, therefore, threaten the persistence of obligate seeding species. Here, we investigate the drought tolerance of two co-occurring Banksia (Proteaceae) species by withholding water in pots to different extents of soil drying. Seed was collected from high- and low-rainfall populations, to test for niche differentiation in water-use strategies at the species level, as well as population differentiation. On the basis of a more negative leaf water potential at minimal levels of stomatal conductance and quantum yield, B. coccinea was considered to be more drought tolerant than B. baxteri. This was supported at the anatomical level according to xylem-vessel attributes, with a higher estimated collapse pressure suggesting that B. coccinea is less vulnerable to xylem cavitation. Population contrasts were observed mainly for B. baxteri, with a lower leaf-expansion increment rate in the low-rainfall population providing for drought avoidance, which was reflected in a higher rate of survival than with the high-rainfall population in which 87.5% of plants showed complete leaf senescence. The implications of species differences in water-use strategies are that community dynamics may start to shift as the climate changes. Importantly, this shift may be population dependent. A systematic understanding of adaptive capacity will help inform the choice of population for use in revegetation programs, which may lead to increased resilience and persistence in the face of environmental change. The results of the present study suggest that should declines in B. baxteri populations be noted, revegetating with seed collected from the low-rainfall population may help improve the chances of this species surviving into the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207