MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

An Analysis of the Resignation System with an Advance Notice of our Country

2009· article· en· W1929153389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rongfang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeEmployment contractContradictionPolitical scienceBusinessHumanitiesLawWork (physics)Philosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Labor Law and EmploymentEmployment contract Law stipulate that employees can terminate all contracts of employment through an advance notice; labor administrative department provides that the contracts terminated by employees through an advance notice are limited to non-fixed term employment contracts; the administrative departments of some special industries formulate that employees are not entitled to terminate the employment contracts through an advance notice. The conflicts and contradictions among legal norms not only do harm to the unity of law, but also damage the employers’ gains on long-term investments and the stability of employment relationship. A series of measurement need to be taken to solve these problems, including restricting the range of application of fixed-term contracts, adjusting the interim and long-term contracts of employment in different ways, and expanding the situations of application of shortest service term. Key words: employees, termination with an advance notice, fixed-term contracts Resume: En Chine, Droit du Travail et Droit du Contrat de Travail stipule que les employes peuvent mettre fin a tous les contrats de travail apres avoir preavise, mais les reglementation de l’administration de travail stipule qu’il est limite seulement pour le contrat de travail sans delai qui peuvent etre resilie apres un preavis. Cependant, dans certains services adminstratifs, il est interdit que les employes resilient le contrat de travail apres un preavis. Le conflit et la contradiction entre les normes juridiques non seulement compromettent sur l'unite du droit, et aussi endommagent les interets de l'investissement a long terme des employeurs, ainsi qu’ils nuisent a la stabilite de l'emploi. Il faut prendre des mesure a resoudre les problemes, y compris les restrictions sur le champ d'application des contrats a duree determinee, les ajustements differents sur les contrats de travail temporaires et a long terme, et aussi les elargissements du champ d'application des dispositions concernant la periode de service minimum. Mots-Cles: employes, resiliation le contrat de travail apres un preavis, contrat a duree determinee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social science→Same topicLabor Movements and Unions→French-language works237,207→