Slow-Release Fertilizer for Rehabilitating Oligotrophic Streams: a Physical Characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A combination of habitat degradation and overharvesting of anadromous salmonids in many of B.C.’s oligotrophic watersheds has prompted the addition of inorganic nutrients to streams, which increases autotrophic production and aids in the restoration of salmonid production. A new slow-release fertilizer (7-40-0, N-P2O5-K2O, percent by weight) was examined to determine its phosphate (PO43-) release rates using laboratory and field trough experiments. A series of indoor trough experiments indicated that the fertilizer pellet dissolution rate (0.393 g ? days-0.401) was independent of the experimental range of water velocity (0.03-0.30 m . s-1), fertilizer pellet size (2–9 g) and water temperature (8–14.5°C). Resulting phosphate additions (0.5-5 µg P . L-1) in outdoor trough experiments increased periphyton biomass and altered the dominance pattern of periphytic diatoms. An optimal phosphate concentration for periphyton biomass was achieved with calculated 3.0 µg P . L-1 phosphate additions from May to June. In June to July, periphyton biomass increased proportionately to fertilizer additions. Saturation of the relative specific growth rate of the diatom community occurred with 1.0 µg P . L-1 phosphate additions. Nitrogen analysis was not conducted since inorganic nitrogen is typically available in non-limiting concentrations (i.e., >50 µg . L-1 dissolved inorganic nitrogen) in the majority of B.C.’s oligotrophic salmonid streams. These studies indicated that slow-release fertilizer may be effective in stimulating autotrophic production and restoring salmonid production in nutrient deficient streams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".