Infliximab for the Treatment of Crohn'S Disease: Review and Indications for Clinical Use in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. It may affect any portion of the gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus. Symptoms typically include cramping abdominal pain, diarrhea (which may be bloody) and nausea. As the severity of the illness worsens, patients may experience constant abdominal pain, vomiting, weight loss and fever. From the perspective of the patient, disease symptoms significantly impair quality of life, and interfere with their work environment and activities of daily living. Unfortunately, there is no cure for Crohn's disease. Patients experience a chronic, relapsing course characterized by recurrent flares of their disease. Conventional medical treatment of Crohn's disease includes the use of non-specific anti-inflammatory drugs (5-aminosalicylic acid agents, prednisone, budesonide), immunosuppressives (6-mercaptopurine, azathioprine, methotrexate) and antibiotics. A variable onset of action, incomplete response rates and a significant risk of adverse effects characterize current therapies. Although surgery is frequently used to treat complications or medically refractory disease, postoperative recurrence is a common problem. Infliximab, a murine chimeric monoclonal antibody directed toward tumour necrosis factor-alpha, is a highly effective treatment of active Crohn's disease. In randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, 33% of patients treated with infliximab 5 mg/kg achieved remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index score less than 150), compared with only 4% of those receiving placebo (P<0.001). Additionally, infliximab is the only drug therapy shown to be effective for the treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease. In studies done to date, infliximab appears to be well tolerated and has a favourable side effect profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".