A shape reconstruction method for diffuse optical tomography using a transport model and level sets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A two-step shape reconstruction method for diffuse optical tomography (DOT) is presented which uses adjoint fields and level sets. The propagation of near-infrared photons in tissue is modeled by the time-dependent linear transport equation, of which the absorption parameter has to be reconstructed from boundary measurements. In the shape reconstruction approach, it is assumed that the inhomogeneous background absorption parameter and the values inside the obstacles are (approximately) known, but that the number, sizes, shapes, and locations of these obstacles have to be reconstructed from the data. An additional difficulty arises due to the presence of so-called clear regions in the medium. The first step of the reconstruction scheme is a transport-backtransport (TBT) method which provides us with a low-contrast approximation to the sought objects. The second step uses this result as an initial guess for solving the shape reconstruction problem. A key point in this second step is the fusion of the 'level set technique' for representing the shapes of the reconstructed obstacles, and an 'adjoint-field technique' for solving the nonlinear inverse problem. Numerical experiments are presented which show that this novel method is able to recover one or more objects very fast and with good accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".