MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1932411702 · doi:10.1161/circ.129.suppl_1.16

Abstract 16: Diabetes, Pre-diabetes, and Progression of Subclinical Myocardial Damage

2014· article· en· W1932411702 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Selvin, Mariana Lazo, Lu Shen, Jonathan Rubin, John W. McEvoy, Ron C. Hoogeveen, Christie M. Ballantyne, Josef Coresh

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusPrediabetesInternal medicineSubclinical infectionType 2 diabetesMyocardial infarctionCardiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Persons with hyperglycemia even below the threshold for the diagnosis of diabetes are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. The relationships of pre-diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes with progression of subclinical myocardial damage are relatively uncharacterized. Objective: To characterize the associations of diabetes and pre-diabetes with 6-year progression of subclinical myocardial injury, as assessed by a novel highly sensitive assay for cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of hs-cTnT measured at two time points, 6 years apart, in 8446 participants of the community-based ARIC Study with hs-cTnT <14 ng/L and without a history of heart disease, stroke or heart failure at baseline (1990-92). We examined the associations of pre-diabetes and diabetes defined by HbA1c or fasting glucose with 6-year change in hs-cTnT after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Diagnosed diabetes was defined as self-reported physician diagnosis or medication use for diabetes. We used Poisson regression to evaluate the risk of progression of hs-cTnT from non-elevated (<14 ng/L) to elevated (≥14 ng/L) (“incident elevated hs-cTnT”) at 6 years of follow-up. Results: Baseline prevalence of elevated concentrations of hs-cTnT among persons with no diabetes (HbA1c<5.7%), prediabetes (HbA1c 5.7-6.4%), undiagnosed diabetes (≥6.5%), and diagnosed diabetes were 1.8%, 3.3%, 6.3% and 10.3%, respectively. Diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, and pre-diabetes were significantly associated with incident elevated hs-cTnT (Table). The associations of undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes defined by diagnostic categories of HbA1c showed somewhat stronger associations compared to those clinical categories defined by fasting glucose. Conclusions: These results provide evidence for a progressive, deleterious effect of hyperglycemia on the myocardium, even below the threshold for a diagnosis of diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207