Inorganic carbon acquisition in two green marine <i>Stichococcus</i> species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism of inorganic carbon (C(i)) uptake was examined in the marine green microalgae Stichococcus cylindricus and Stichococcus minor. External carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity was not detected in either species, by potentiometric assay or by mass spectrometry. Photosynthetic characteristics of C(i) uptake indicate that both species have high apparent affinity for CO(2) with a low K(1/2) (CO(2)) of about 10 µm. The O(2) evolution rates in light exceeded the spontaneous CO(2) formation rate by 2.5-fold in both species, which thus have active bicarbonate uptake. Mass spectrometric monitoring of CO(2) and O(2) fluxes showed that rates of O(2) evolution exceeded those of CO(2) depletion by about three- and twofold in S. minor and S. cylindricus, respectively, and also showed, in cells photosynthesizing at pH 8.2, a rapid depletion of CO(2) upon illumination to a CO(2) compensation concentration of 15.42 and 12.03 µm in S. minor and S. cylindricus, respectively. Both species also exhibit active CO(2) uptake: addition of bovine CA at CO(2) compensation concentration caused a rapid rise in CO(2) as the CO(2) -HCO(3) (-) equilibrium was restored. Accumulation of unfixed C(i) by cells at pH 8.2 was calculated to be 84.33 mm in S. cylindricus, and 30.37 mm in S. minor to give internal accumulations of 23- and 8-fold, respectively, compared to the external C(i) concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".