Rights Protection of Nameless Body: Seeking Relief in the Lost —in the Aspect of Judicial Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Do correlated units have influences to require compensates for bodies whose identities can’t be proved? Not only jurisprudence and reality society separately holds different views, but also inside themselves, there are no common ideas. Likewise, the lack of consummation in legislation always leads one same case to opposite judgments in each local people’s court. First of all, through the jurisprudence analyses about the meaning of the civil rights of bodied whose identities can’t be proved, protection rules of civil right of bodies whose identities can’t be proved should be set up. Secondly, through the intensive analyses of present jurisprudence prescript, including limitation, protection rules should be nailed down. Thirdly, based on the present jurisprudence rules, author offers advise in details on the course of judgment in the way of protection of bodies’ civil rights. Key words: nameless body, civil rights, Judicial Protection Resume: Les departements competents ont-ils le droit de reclamer l’indemnite pour un cadavre inconnu ? Le milieu juridique et le milieu d’application exposent leur propre opinion, meme a l’interieur de chaque milieu, le debat ne se cesse pas. A cause de l’imperfection de la legislation, les tribunaux populaires locaux n’ont pas une connaissance unanime sur cela et prennent des actions judicaires contraires. D’abord, a travers l’analyse juridique du contenu des droits civils du cadavre inconnu, l’auteur pense qu’il faut etablir le systeme de protection des droits civils du cadavre inconnu. Ensuite, apres l’etude des reglements legaux et de ses inconvenients, il est d’avis qu’on doit preciser juridiquement ce systeme de protection. Finalement, sur la base du systeme legal en vigueur et d’apres le principe du droit civil, l’esprit de la legislation civile et la fonction de guidage judicaire, il donne, en ce qui concerne les moyens de protection, des propositions concretes sur le processus judicaire. Mots-cles: cadavre inconnu, droits civils, protection judicaire 摘要：相關部門有無權力為無名屍索賠？法學界、實務界各抒己見，就是法學界和實務界內部也爭論不休。由於立法的不完善，導致各地人民法院對其在認識上以及司法上的絕然相反。首先，本文通過對無名屍民事權利的內涵的法理分析，認為應設立無名屍民事權利保護制度。其次，通過對我國現行法律規定及其缺陷的透析，認為應從法律上明確無名屍民事權利的保護制度。再次，筆者在現行法律制度的基礎上，從民法的原 則、民事立法精神以及司法的引導功能，就我國對無名屍民事權利的保護途徑，從審判程式上提出了具體的 意見。 關鍵詞：無名屍；民事權利；司法保護
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".