Archives and Privacy in a Wired World: The Impact of the Personal Information Act (Bill C-6) on Archives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette priode informatique de l'Internet et du courrier lectronique, des bases de donnes transnationales et du commerce lectronique, on peut constater une peur grandissante que les renseignements personnels soient vendus aux plus offrants et que la confidentialit soit constamment rode.Le gouvernement canadien a entendu et rpondu ses citoyens ainsi qu' la communaut internationale qui demandait des normes plus serres.La Loi sur les renseignements personnels de 2000 (projet de loi C-6) met en place les conditions auxquelles les compagnies prives et les individus doivent se conformer pour protger les informations personnelles.Cependant, les dfenseurs de la confidentialit ont fait valoir que des mesures plus fortes encore taient ncessaires.Cet article examine l'impact de la Loi sur les renseignements personnels sur les centres d'archives.En effet, afin de protger la confidentialit et les renseignements personnels, la lgislation et les dfenseurs de la confidentialit semblent prts sacrifier divers aspects de la culture et de l'histoire.Les archivistes doivent s'assurer que cela ne se produira pas et trouver un quilibre entre les atteintes la confidentialit et le besoin des Canadiens de se connatre, de mme que leur pass et leur histoire collective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".