Significance of the Immunohistochemical Expression of Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐4 in Bone Maturation after Maxillary Sinus Grafting in Humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) protein superfamily and are known to be involved in bone and cartilage formation. Within this family, BMP-4 is one of the most studied members. It has been shown to induce osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoprogenitor cells in vitro, but the intimate processes in which this protein promotes and regulates osseous repair still remains unclear. PURPOSE: To assess whether the native cellular immunohistochemical expression of BMP-4 correlates with the maturation of bone samples obtained at 6 months after maxillary sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histopathological and histomorphometrical analyses were performed in all the samples, which were obtained from a total of 58 patients. Immunohistochemical expression of BMP-4 was analyzed in 30 core biopsies obtained from maxillary sinuses grafted with a combination of anorganic bovine bone and autogenous cortical bone [1:1] (AB-group), and 18 biopsies from maxillary sinuses grafted solely with a cortico-cancellous particulate allograft (M-group), all of them after a 6-month healing period. Also, 10 biopsies of native pristine bone were obtained and used as control group (C-group). RESULTS: Mild to moderate immunohistochemical expression of native granular BMP-4 was present in 56.8% (31.0% AB-group, 22.4% M-group, and 3.4% C-group) (p = 0.000, chi-square) of the specimens analyzed. BMP-4 expression was primarily located in the cytoplasm of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and epithelial cells of the schneiderian membrane. Whereas significant differences were observed in the proportion of mineralized tissue and cellularity between sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone, allograft, or nongrafted sinuses, there were no statistically significant differences in the cellular expression of BMP-4 among groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the native expression of BMP-4 appears to be associated with normal bone homeostasis and reparation in grafted and nongrafted maxillary sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".