Sperm Calcium Levels and Chlortetracycline Fluorescence Patterns are Related to the In Vivo Fertility of Cryopreserved Bovine Semen
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryopreserved bovine semen is less fertile than fresh semen for reasons that have not been fully elucidated. Cryopreservation is known to disrupt the sperm plasma membrane and it induces premature capacitation of a sperm subpopulation, which may be a result of the increased internal calcium levels after thawing. To test the hypothesis that sperm intracellular calcium level is correlated with in vivo fertility, we used the fluorescent calcium indicator, indo-1, and flow cytometry to assess intracellular calcium levels in frozen-thawed sperm from bulls of varying degrees of fertility. We also tested a second hypothesis that the physiological status of sperm, as assessed by the chlortetracycline (CTC) fluorescent assay, is correlated with fertility. As detected by indo-1 fluorescence, the intracellular calcium level is negatively correlated with bull fertility immediately after thawing (P = .0362; n = 3 ejaculates from each of 10 animals). Moreover, there was a significant difference between the 3 most and least fertile bulls over 4 hours of incubation (P < .05; n = 3 ejaculates per bull). Finally, there was a positive correlation between sperm displaying the CTC acrosome reaction pattern and fertility (P = .0014; n = 3 ejaculates from each of 10 bulls).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it