MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934879885 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0474

Ab initio study of the structural and optoelectronic properties of the half-Heusler CoCr<i>Z</i> (<i>Z</i> = Al, Ga)

2014· article· en· W1934879885 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adda Missoum, T. Seddik, G. Murtaza, R. Khenata, A. Bouhemadou, Y. Al-Douri, H. Meradji, H. Baltache

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHeusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsHydrostatic pressureAb initioFermi levelElectronic band structureAb initio quantum chemistry methodsParamagnetismBand gapElectronic structureOptical conductivityLattice constantElectronOpticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To study the structural, electronic, and optical properties of the half-Heusler CoCrZ (Z = Al, Ga), we have performed ab initio calculations using the full-potential with the mixed basis (APW + lo) method within the generalized gradient approximation. The structural properties as well as the band structures, and total and atomic projected densities of states are computed. From electronic band structures we have found that both compounds have a semimetallic nature. We also studied the evolution of electronic structure of CoCrAl under external hydrostatic pressure. It is found that the pseudo gap around the Fermi level increases continuously with increasing pressure, while the electronic density of states at the Fermi level does not change significantly. Furthermore, the optical properties, such as the dielectric function and refractive index were evaluated and discussed under pressure up to 20 GPa, and the electrical conductivity and electron energy loss were calculated for radiation up to 30 eV. The same way, we have studied the magnetic properties of CoCrAl for lattice expansion up to a = 1.1a 0 where a transition from the paramagnetic phase to the half-metallic phase is expected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicHeusler alloys: electronic and magnetic propertiesFrench-language works237,207