MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934920771

Adaptation, density dependence and the responses of trophic level abundances to mortality

2003· article· en· W1934920771 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter A. Abrams, Matthijs Vos

Bibliographic record

VenueKNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJohn Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
KeywordsTrophic levelForagingBiologyPredationEcologyAdaptation (eye)Abundance (ecology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use simple models to examine how the abundances of three trophic levels change in response to mortality imposed on each one of the levels. The models contain two factors whose joint effects have not been incorporated into previous analyses: direct density dependence ('self-damping') at trophic levels above the bottom level, and adaptive change on the middle trophic level. The adaptive change involves balancing foraging gains and risks of predation. The combination of this type of adaptation and self-damping leads to a wide variety of potential responses of trophic level abundances to increased per capita mortality at any one level. However, the signs of the responses at each level can often be predicted from a knowledge of the strength of direct density dependence together with three additional quantities: the shape of the relationship between resource intake and per capita growth rate for the middle level; the curvature of the function relating the fitness of the middle level species to its foraging effort; and the change in the ratio of predation vulnerability to foraging effort as effort changes. Some possible responses include a decrease in all three levels with increased mortality of the top level, and an increased density of either the middle or top level, following increased mortality imposed on it or its prey. We show that the responses of trophic levels to mortalities are similar for several different mechanisms of adaptive change on the middle level - micro-evolution or behaviour, species replacement and induced defence. Possible evidence for some of the novel predictions is discussed, as is the need for experimental studies of the consequences of mortality rates at all trophic levels, quantification of direct density dependence, and studies of the shapes of functional and numerical responses. [KEYWORDS: adaptive foraging; bottom-up effect; density dependence food web; inducible defences; top-down effect; tritrophic system]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)Same topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207