Perceptions of School Health in Selected Primary Schools in Trinidad and Tobago
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The state of health of primary schools in Trinidad and Tobago has been described as 'organizational pathologies' with poor motivation of teachers, student indiscipline, low levels of academic achievement, teacher and student violence and absenteeism (White Paper, 1993-2003). Indeed, the Strategic Plan (2002-2006) of the Ministry of Education has noted an alarming increase of crime and violence in our schools that is having an adverse effect on positive learning and teaching (GOTT 2002). So critical was the situation that the Ministry of Education commissioned a study in 2002 on delinquency in schools to make recommendations to improve the overall health of our schools. This Deosaran Study on delinquency in our schools identified an alarming increase in student delinquent behavior in schools - bullying, truancy, verbal abuse, fighting, disrespect for teachers, among others (Deosaran 2004). The Ministry of Education has also taken some initiatives to improve the health and safety of our schools. Some of these are: school feeding programs; student support services; peace promotion programs; empowerment of student councils; improved home - school linkages; more involvement of NGO's in promoting school health practices. At the global level the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a world wide school health initiative to assist schools, community, parents and students to find appropriate and unique ways to become 'health promoting schools'. These schools displayed the following characteristics: a safe and healthy environment, both physical and psychosocial; an effective skills-based education; access to health services; school policies and practices that support health; improvement of the health of the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".