In the Adolescent Rye: the Lonely Catcher of Innocence： the Symbolic Meanings in The Catcher of the Rye
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Catcher in the Rye is regarded as one of the most popular modern classics in American literature, and the hero of this novel, Holden Caulfield, also is one of the most famous characters in American literary history. On the basis of analysis of the symbolic meanings of the imagery of articles, surroundings and protagonist in the novel, this paper explores Holden’s rebellion, radical ness, enthusiasm and his inner world —the lonely watcher in the rye. Key words: The Catcher in the Rye, the imagery, the symbolism of surroundings, the symbolism of the protagonist Resume L’Attrape-Coeur est considere comme un des classiques modernes dans la litterature contemporaire americaine, et le heros de ce roman, Holden Caulfield, est aussi l’un des personnages litteraires les plus connus de l’histoire litteraite americaine. Sur la base de l’analyse des significations symboliques des images, de l’environnement et du heros de ce roman, l’article suivant explore d’une maniere approfondie les caracteres rebelle, radical, faible d’Holden Caulfield et son monde interieur — la garde solitaire dans le « chams de ble » Mots cles: L’Attrape-Coeu,des images symboliques,l’environnement symbolique, le heros symbolique 摘 要 《麥田裏的守望者》被稱為當代美國文學的 “現代經典 ”之一,小說中的主人公霍爾頓 •考菲爾德更是美國文學史上最著名的文學形象之一。本文通過對小說中反復出現的事物﹑環境﹑主人公的象徵意義的闡釋，深入分析了一個 “守望者 ”霍爾頓 •考菲爾德，在成長的 “麥田”上，孤獨的精神世界以及其叛逆﹑激進同時又軟弱的性格特徵。 關鍵詞：《麥田裏的守望者》；象徵性事物；象徵性環境；象徵性主人公
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".