A novel reporter for intrachromosomal homoeologous recombination in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A reporter system using engineered introns as recombination substrates in the uidA (GUS) gene has been developed and characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana. The non-coding nature of the recombination substrate has allowed us to monitor recombination events between duplicated copies of the intron that are either identical (homologous recombination) or harbour sequence polymorphisms (homoeologous recombination). The effects of substrate length and divergence on the frequency of recombination events were examined. A positive correlation between substrate length and somatic recombination frequency was found as the frequency of recombination increased 183-fold when the recombination substrate was lengthened from 153 to 589 bp. The existence of 11 polymorphisms in a 589-bp recombination substrate (1.9% sequence divergence) led to an almost 10-fold reduction in the frequency of recombination. This result demonstrates that relatively modest levels of sequence divergence can substantially reduce the frequency of recombination in plants. A molecular analysis of recombination products revealed that the recombination junctions are more frequent in the central segment of the recombination substrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".