Patterned Purkinje cell loss in the ataxic sticky mouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ataxic sticky (sti/sti) mouse is a spontaneous autosomal recessive mutant resulting from a disruption in the editing domain of the alanyl-tRNA synthetase (Aars) gene. The sticky phenotype is characterized by a small body size, a characteristic unkempt coat and neurological manifestations including marked tremor and ataxia starting at 6 weeks of age. The present study was undertaken to examine the spatiotemporal features of Purkinje cell degeneration in the sticky mouse. Purkinje cell loss was found to be both progressive and patterned, with vermal lobules VI, IX and X, crus 1 of the hemisphere, and the flocculus and paraflocculus being differentially resistant to degeneration. The pattern of Purkinje cell degeneration in sticky is not random - in general, the sphingosine kinase 1a-immunonegative Purkinje cell subset is preferentially susceptible to early cell death. In addition, zebrin II/aldolase C expression in the sticky cerebellum is profoundly downregulated, whereas the heat-shock protein 25 is both ectopically expressed in some scattered Purkinje cells and downregulated in other Purkinje cells in which it is normally expressed constitutively. Compared with many mouse mutants with patterned Purkinje cell death, in which successive stripes of cell loss are very clear, Purkinje cell loss in sticky shows a less clear-cut pattern between different Purkinje cell subtypes, with the result that preferential survival is less dramatic. This may represent a secondary consequence of the downregulation of zebrin II expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".