MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novel error-control methodology for finite difference and finite element based electrostatic green's function computation in inhomogeneous substrates

2015· article· en· W1936513590 on OpenAlex
Mohammed Al-Qedra, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodSolverFinite difference methodCapacitanceMatrix (chemical analysis)ComputationApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsMathematical optimizationMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrostatic analysis of complex 3-D structures represents an indispensable design optimization tool and essential verification stage in modern electronic design automation of integrated circuit chips and packages. Maxwell capacitance matrix of multi-conductor geometries embedded in inhomogeneous substrates is among the primary quantities that an electrostatic field solver produces. Accurate knowledge of Maxwell capacitance matrix is crucial for signal integrity characterization and quantifying critical performance-related circuit features such as speed and functionality. Integral equation formulation for capacitance extraction is favored over its differential equation counterpart since its method-of-moments (MoM) or locally-corrected Nyström (L. F. Canino, J. J. Ottusch, M. A. Stalzer, J. L. Visher, and S. M. Wandzura, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 627–663, 1998) matrix representation only involves discretizing the surface of the conductor upon the availability of the Green's function for the background medium. A finite difference method (FDM) based and high-order finite element method (HO-FEM) based electrostatic Green's function computation in planar stratified media have been introduced in (A. Cangellaris and L. Yang, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3133–3136, 2001) and (M. Al-Qedra and V. Okhmatovski, IEEE Int. Symp. on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, pp. 189, 2013) respectively with several practical numerical examples. In this work, we extend both the FDM and the HO-FEM based techniques for electrostatic Green's function computation in planar stratified media to include mathematical formulation that allow for quantitative error analysis. The formulation begins with general expression of spectral domain Green's function at any point in the layered media as a sum of primary (in vicinity of source) and secondary field terms. The exact evaluation of spectral domain Green's function is composed of numerically calculated term superposed with error term. Using Taylor expansion for the exponentials carrying the spectral variable and with the knowledge of the utilized numerical scheme (FDM or HO-FEM), the Taylor expansion is truncated to a finite set of polynomials corresponding to the error function. Taking the inverse Fourier-Bessel transform of the error function yields the error function with respect to location and grid size. In addition we provide three numerical comparison studies. First, developed numerical method is used to simulate for structures having known analytical solutions. Another study consists of refining the mesh (computational domain) until convergence of result is achieved according to a predefined accuracy. Moreover, the computational method is benchmarked with other gold standard software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it