MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1936649870 · doi:10.29173/eth181

La Escuelita de Alicia Partnoy: una mirada al interior

2014· article· es· W1936649870 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dalene Van Heusden

Bibliographic record

VenueEl texto hispanoamericano/The Spanish American Text · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestimonialHumanitiesPrisonFeelingArtPsychologyCriminologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Escuelita. Relatos testimoniales es el título de la obra de Alicia Partnoy, víctima de la represión de la dictadura militar argentina en los años setenta. En este libro, Partnoy relata su propia experiencia, así como la de sus compañeros de prisión. Este trabajo propone que a través de recursos retóricos como el lenguaje infantil y la inclusión de símbolos como el pan y la venda sobre los ojos de los presos, Partnoy acerca al lector a las sensaciones físicas y percepciones de los cautivos y, a partir de éstas, a la experiencia y el significado del cautiverio. En este sentido, la autora consigue una identificación del lector con los prisioneros y el rechazo total hacia sus opresores. The Little School. Tales of Dissapearance and Survival is the title of the testimonial book by Alicia Partnoy, who was incarcerated by the military government in Argentina during the decade of the 70s. In this book, Partnoy tells her own experience in prison and that of other victims of the regime. This article suggests that the work of Partnoy includes rhethorical tools such as the use of childish language and the insertion of symbols like a piece of bread and a blindfold covering the prisoners’ eyes, which render the reader closer to the prisoners’ perceptions and feelings. In this way, Partnoy’s account enables the reader to explore by himself the prison experience. The author achieves an identification of the reader with the prisoners, as well as negative feelings towards the oppressors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.020
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEl texto hispanoamericano/The Spanish American TextSame topicLatin American Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207