MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1936676727

DIÁLOGO CON INSTITUCIONES CANADIENSES

2004· article· es· W1936676727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosaura Ruiz, José Luís Palacio Prieto, Guillermo Pulido, Esperanza Garrido

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CON EL PROPOSITO DE CONCERTAR UNA SERIE DE PL TICAS ACERCA DEL INTERCAMBIO DE ESTUDIANTES Y ACADEMICOS, ACRECENTAR EL NUMERO DE INTERCAMBIOS DE ESTUDIANTES GRADUADOS Y LA POSIBILIDAD DE HACER POSGRADOS CONJUNTOS, ROSAURA RUIZ, SECRETARIA DE DESARROLLO INSTITUCIONAL DE LA UNAM, VISITO LA ESCUELA DE EXTENSION DE ESTA CASA DE ESTUDIOS EN CANAD  (ESECA). SE CONCERTARON PL TICAS CON FUNCIONARIOS DE UNIVERSIDADES CANADIENSES COMO: CARLETON, OTTAWA, QUEBEC, MONTREAL, CONCORDIA Y MCGILL, QUIENES MOSTRARON GRAN INTERES POR EL ESPANOL Y SE ACOGIO CON MUCHO ENTUSIASMO LA POSIBILIDAD DE QUE ESTUDIANTES CANADIENSES VISITEN LA CIUDAD DE MEXICO EN EL MARCO DE UN PROGRAMA DE INTERCAMBIO. SE RECIBIO CON ENTUSIASMO LA POSIBILIDAD DE COOPERACION CON EL CENTRO DE ENSENANZA PARA EXTRANJEROS (CEPE) EN EL DIPLOMADO EN FORMACION DE PROFESORES DE ESPANOL COMO LENGUA EXTRANJERA QUE EST  POR TRANSFORMARSE EN UNA MAESTRIA. ADEM S, DE LOS EX MENES DE COMPETENCIA DE LA LENGUA ESPANOLA QUE LA UNAM PRETENDE PROMOVER EN ESE PAIS. ROSAURA RUIZ ESTUVO ACOMPANADA POR JOSE LUIS PALACIO PRIETO, DIRECTOR GENERAL DE ESTUDIOS DE POSGRADO; POR GUILLERMO PULIDO, DIRECTOR GENERAL DEL CEPE, Y POR ESPERANZA GARRIDO, DIRECTORA DE LA ESECA. LA FUNCIONARIA TAMBIEN VISITO LAS INSTALACIONES DE LA ESCUELA, SE ENTREVISTO CON EL PERSONAL ACADEMICO Y CONOCIO DE MANERA M S DIRECTA LAS ACTIVIDADES DE LAS DIVERSAS  REAS QUE LA CONFORMAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009)Same topicHigher Education Teaching and EvaluationFrench-language works237,207