MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1936676727

DIÁLOGO CON INSTITUCIONES CANADIENSES

2004· article· es· W1936676727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosaura Ruiz, José Luís Palacio Prieto, Guillermo Pulido, Esperanza Garrido

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CON EL PROPOSITO DE CONCERTAR UNA SERIE DE PL TICAS ACERCA DEL INTERCAMBIO DE ESTUDIANTES Y ACADEMICOS, ACRECENTAR EL NUMERO DE INTERCAMBIOS DE ESTUDIANTES GRADUADOS Y LA POSIBILIDAD DE HACER POSGRADOS CONJUNTOS, ROSAURA RUIZ, SECRETARIA DE DESARROLLO INSTITUCIONAL DE LA UNAM, VISITO LA ESCUELA DE EXTENSION DE ESTA CASA DE ESTUDIOS EN CANAD  (ESECA). SE CONCERTARON PL TICAS CON FUNCIONARIOS DE UNIVERSIDADES CANADIENSES COMO: CARLETON, OTTAWA, QUEBEC, MONTREAL, CONCORDIA Y MCGILL, QUIENES MOSTRARON GRAN INTERES POR EL ESPANOL Y SE ACOGIO CON MUCHO ENTUSIASMO LA POSIBILIDAD DE QUE ESTUDIANTES CANADIENSES VISITEN LA CIUDAD DE MEXICO EN EL MARCO DE UN PROGRAMA DE INTERCAMBIO. SE RECIBIO CON ENTUSIASMO LA POSIBILIDAD DE COOPERACION CON EL CENTRO DE ENSENANZA PARA EXTRANJEROS (CEPE) EN EL DIPLOMADO EN FORMACION DE PROFESORES DE ESPANOL COMO LENGUA EXTRANJERA QUE EST  POR TRANSFORMARSE EN UNA MAESTRIA. ADEM S, DE LOS EX MENES DE COMPETENCIA DE LA LENGUA ESPANOLA QUE LA UNAM PRETENDE PROMOVER EN ESE PAIS. ROSAURA RUIZ ESTUVO ACOMPANADA POR JOSE LUIS PALACIO PRIETO, DIRECTOR GENERAL DE ESTUDIOS DE POSGRADO; POR GUILLERMO PULIDO, DIRECTOR GENERAL DEL CEPE, Y POR ESPERANZA GARRIDO, DIRECTORA DE LA ESECA. LA FUNCIONARIA TAMBIEN VISITO LAS INSTALACIONES DE LA ESCUELA, SE ENTREVISTO CON EL PERSONAL ACADEMICO Y CONOCIO DE MANERA M S DIRECTA LAS ACTIVIDADES DE LAS DIVERSAS  REAS QUE LA CONFORMAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0450.013
Scholarly communication0.0170.007
Open science0.0020.019
Research integrity0.0060.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009)Same topicHigher Education Teaching and EvaluationFrench-language works237,207