MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1936819345 · doi:10.1111/afe.12016

Evaluation of synthetic sex pheromone for monitoring and management of raspberry crown borer <i>Pennisetia marginata</i> ( <scp>L</scp> epidoptera: <scp>S</scp> esiidae)

2013· article· en· W1936819345 on OpenAlexafffund
Carolyn Teasdale, Gary J. R. Judd, Regine Gries, Gerhard Gries

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural and Forest Entomology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pheromone Research and Control
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsPheromonePheromone trapSex pheromoneBiologyAttractionHorticultureBlowing a raspberryPhenologyBotanyKairomoneToxicologyAnimal scienceEcologyHost (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ( E , Z )‐3,13‐Octadecadienal ( E 3, Z 13‐18:Ald) was recently identified as a sex pheromone component of the raspberry crown borer Pennisetia marginata ( H arris) ( L epidoptera: S esiidae). Although unstable, this pheromone may have utility for monitoring the seasonal abundance and flight phenology of adult P. marginata , as well as for developing control tactics, such as disorienting mate‐seeking males. Experiments conducted in raspberry and blackberry crops tested the effect of lure and trap attributes on captures of male P. marginata . Increasing lure loads (10, 100 or 1000 µg) of E 3, Z 13‐18:Ald significantly increased trap captures. Freshly prepared lures were significantly more attractive than lures aged for 2–10 days at room temperature. White wing traps and white delta traps were more effective than green delta or green bucket traps. Trap height in the crop canopy had no effect on the capture of males. When sex pheromone components of three other sesiid moth species were added to E 3, Z 13‐18: A ld, the attraction of male P. marginata was reduced and, thus, these components were identified as pheromone antagonists. Pheromone‐based mass trapping with 25 wing traps per hectare reduced captures of males in traps baited with a low‐dose (10 µg) pheromone lure by 67–87% in 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural and Forest EntomologySame topicInsect Pheromone Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207