MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1937039320 · doi:10.1177/10253823050120030104x

D'Amiens à Québec : Les jalons d'une aventure à poursuivre

2005· article· fr· W1937039320 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie-Christine Avargues, Josée Bourdages, Philippe Lorenzo, Louise Potvin

Bibliographic record

VenuePromotion & Education · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesLibrary scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

D'Amiens à Québec, les deux premiers colloques sur les programmes locaux et régionaux de santé ont ouvert la route à un nouveau paradigme pour la santé publique. Partager les expériences de terrain pour penser autrement les pratiques. Créer des passerelles entre les champs de la promotion, de la prévention, des soins et de l'insertion, entre les niveaux d'action et de décision, entre les acteurs d'horizon divers. Les défis ont été relevés, Amiens en octobre 2001, Québec, trois ans plus tard. Reste à poursuivre et enrichir les échanges sur un plan international en renforçant la francophonie, en capitalisant les approches et les outils, en mobilisant de nouveaux partenaires. Rendez-vous est donné pour cette nouvelle phase de l'aventure en marche vers un troisième colloque. From Amiens to Quebec: the first milestones of an on-going adventure The first two international conferences on local and regional health programmes held in Amiens and Quebec have paved the road for a new public health paradigm. The conferences have served to share experiences from the field to re-think practice and create bridges between health promotion, prevention, care and integration at both the action and decision levels, and amongst diverse actors from the field. The challenges have been put forth, in Amiens in 2001 and in Quebec three years later. The next step is to pursue and enrich these exchanges at the international level reinforcing the Francophone position by capitalising on approaches and tools, and mobilising new partners. The next rendezvous for this on-going adventure is set for the third conference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePromotion & EducationSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207