MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Genetic and environmental components of phenotypic variation in body shape among populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)

2006· article· en· W1938077101 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Julie Marcil, Douglas P. Swain, Jeffrey A. Hutchings

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Journal of the Linnean Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaDalhousie University
FundersDivision of Ocean SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsBiologyGadusAtlantic codPhenotypic plasticityPopulationZoologyEcologyGenetic variabilityGenetic variationGenetic divergenceCapelinPredationGenetic diversityFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common-garden experiment was conducted on larvae to test for genetic differences in body shape among populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Offspring from four north-west Atlantic regions were reared from hatching to postmetamorphosis at two temperatures (7 ± 1 °C and 11 ± 1 °C) and two food levels (1500 and 4500 prey L−1). Body shape differed between populations and treatments. Population differences were greatest between south-west Scotian Shelf cod and those further north; the former were characterized by a deeper body, larger head, and longer caudal peduncle than cod from the other populations. Significant differences were also observed between two putative populations on the south-west Scotian Shelf, suggesting genetic divergence between spawning aggregations at small spatial scales (< 100 km). Temperature and food supply also influenced body shape, with the effect of the former being more pronounced. Individuals reared at the higher temperature or food level had a deeper body and a larger head than those reared at the lower temperature or food supply. Phenotypic responses to changes in the rearing environment also differed among populations, indicating genetic differences in phenotypic plasticity. Differences between populations in morphology and in phenotypic plasticity suggest genetic divergence at both large (> 1000 km) and small (< 100 km) spatial scales. The genetic differences at large spatial scales counteracted the expected effects of temperature differences in the wild, suggesting countergradient variation in morphology among these populations. © 2006 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Journal compilation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological Journal of the Linnean SocietySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207