Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, on décrit les mesures de l'effet de la masse des couches de revêtement, de la taille et de l'espacement des colombages, des séparations structurales et de la présence d'isolant dans les cavités sur l'affaiblissement acoustique des murs extérieurs à ossature de bois. Au Canada, les constructions modernes sont généralement plus hermétiques que les immeubles plus anciens, et leurs murs, plus épais, contiennent plus d'isolant thermique. Cette recherche sur les propriétés acoustiques des murs modernes fait partie d'un projet plus important portant sur l'évaluation des éléments des façades extérieures et sur l'élaboration d'une procédure informatique permettant de concevoir l'insonorisation des immeubles exposés aux bruits des aéronefs. Nous avons effectué des mesures conformément à la méthode E90 de l'ASTM, mais dans une gamme de fréquences allant de 50 à 5 kHz. Nous avons classé l'efficacité globale des murs à l'aide de la classe de transmissions extérieur-intérieur (OITC) de l'ASTM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".