MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1939976242

Costs, CO2-emissions and energy balance for applying Nordic methods of forest biomass utilization in British Columbia

2009· dissertation· en· W1939976242 on OpenAlex
Björn Nilsson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicForest Biomass Utilization and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaSveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
KeywordsSlash (logging)BioenergyBiomass (ecology)Context (archaeology)Environmental scienceProfitability indexFuel efficiencyForestryBiofuelEngineeringAgricultural engineeringEnvironmental engineeringAgroforestryWaste managementBusinessGeographyAgronomyAutomotive engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A devastating mountain pine beetle (MPB) infestation in British Columbia has had enormous economic consequences for the lumber industry and has been one of the drivers for the development of bioenergy systems. Transportation is the link between forests and the end-users and also a critical factor for profitability. Transport efficiency can in the bioenergy context be evaluated by the costs, but also by the discharged CO2-emission levels and its energy balance. 
\n
\nThe objective of this study was to evaluate three transportation systems with the central difference in the processing level of slash. The feasibility of MPB-killed biomass was compared with vigorous biomass and all systems were modeled over a range of transport distances. Results are expressed in Canadian $/MWh, kg CO2/MWh and ratio between consumed and harvested energy (%). 
\n
\nThe Hog fuel-system, with a grinder allocated to the roadside, was generally the most economical alternative irrespective of slash amount at landing or transport distance. To produce bundles at roadside and transport to the end-user was the most economical alternative for small amount of slash (corresponding to 10 ha final felling) at landing and transport distances over 250 km. Under such conditions the combination of fairly good truckload capacity and low allocation costs compensated for the low bundler productivity. It was in all assessed comparisons least economical to transport the slash in its uncomminuted form to grind it into hog fuel after deliverance to industry. The Bundle-system and the Hog fuel-system had the lowest respectively the highest levels of discharged CO2-emissions. The systems' energy consumption corresponded to 3-10% of the harvested energy, with the Bundle-system and the Hog-fuel system being the most and least, respectively, energy efficient system.
\n
\nBoth the Hog fuel-system and the Bundle-system are viable opportunities for the recovery of B.C.'s available biomass resources. MPB-killed biomass increased the transport efficiency as it resulted in lower costs and lower levels of discharged CO2-emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it