MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1940470769 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511721953.013

The evolution of social behavior in Passalidae (Coleoptera)

2010· book-chapter· en· W1940470769 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPupaFecesLarvaOffspringBiologyJuvenileZoologyDigestive tractInoculationInsectEcologyHorticulturePregnancyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most members of the Passalidae live in rotting wood. They occur in family groups including male and female parents, eggs, larvae, pupae, and teneral and mature offspring. All stages must eat the feces of the mature adults. Feces are comprised of wood that is fragmented, digested, inoculated with bacteria and fungi from the digestive tract of the adults, and further decomposed after being excreted, an example of an external rumen. Larvae and adults cooperate in pupal case construction and teneral adults repair pupal cases of siblings. The selective advantages of adults and offspring staying together may include: (1) gaining protection and food from the log in which egg–laying occurred; and (2) adults supplying the larvae with shredded wood and feces, which speeds juvenile development and consequently increases the degree of overlap of generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it