MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1940603260 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001145

Delayed (>3 weeks) postnatal corticosteroids for chronic lung disease in preterm infants

2003· review· en· W1940603260 on OpenAlexaff
Henry L. Halliday, Richard A. Ehrenkranz, Lex W. Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaNecrotizing enterocolitisRetinopathy of prematurityDexamethasonePediatricsRespiratory distressRandomized controlled trialInternal medicinePregnancySurgeryGestational age

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Many preterm babies who survive, having had respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) or not, go on to develop chronic lung disease (CLD). This is probably due to persistence of inflammation in the lung. Corticosteroids have powerful anti-inflammatory effects and have been used to treat established CLD. However it is unclear whether any beneficial effects outweigh the adverse effects of these drugs. OBJECTIVES: To determine if late (> 3 weeks) postnatal corticosteroid treatment vs control (placebo or nothing) is of benefit in the treatment of chronic lung disease (CLD) in the preterm infant. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials of postnatal corticosteroid therapy were sought from the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, hand searching paediatric and perinatal journals, examining previous review articles and information received from practising neonatologists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of postnatal corticosteroid treatment initiated at > 3 weeks of age in preterm infants with CLD were selected for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality before discharge, failure to extubate, infection, hyperglycaemia, hypertension, severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation, echodensities on ultrasound scan of brain, need for home oxygen, glycosuria, need for late rescue with dexamethasone, cerebral palsy in survivors and blindness in survivors including a study reporting 5 year follow-up were abstracted and analysed using Revman 4.1. MAIN RESULTS: Delayed steroid treatment had no effect on mortality. Beneficial effects of delayed steroid treatment included reductions in failure to extubate by 7 or 28 days, need for late rescue treatment with dexamethasone, chronic lung disease at 36 weeks, death or CLD at 36 wk, and discharge to home on oxygen therapy. There was no increase in risk of infection, necrotising enterocolitis, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Short-term adverse affects included hyperglycaemia, glycosuria and hypertension. There was an increase in severe retinopathy of prematurity, of borderline significance in survivors, but no significant increase in blindness. Although there were increases in long-term neurologic sequelae, including abnormal neurologic examination and cerebral palsy, those apparent trends were offset by a trend in the opposite direction due to an increased incidence of death before follow-up assessment. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of late corticosteroid therapy may not outweigh actual or potential adverse effects. Although there continues to be concern about an increased incidence of adverse neurological outcomes in infants treated with postnatal steroids (see also review of Early postnatal corticosteroids), this review of postnatal corticosteroid treatment for CLD initiated after three weeks of age suggests that late or delayed therapy may not significantly increase the risk of adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Nonetheless, corticosteroids should still be reserved for infants who cannot be weaned from mechanical ventilation. The dose of dexamethasone and the duration of any course of treatment should still be minimized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations219
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsFrench-language works237,207