Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper illustrates the thematic meaning of John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men from the metaphorical meaning of the title, namely, men and mice have the same destiny，and nobody has the capability to change his destiny. Key words: thematic meaning , metaphorical meaning, destiny Resume La solitude, le bien et le mal, le conflit des classes, ces points de vue ne peuvent pas tous reveler completement le sens thematique de Des souris et des hommes. A partir de la signification mehaphorique du titre, cet article interprete le sens thematique du roman, a savoir que les hommes et les souris ont la meme destinee et qu’aucun ne peut echapper a sa destinee. Mots cles : le sens thematique, la signification metaphorique, la destinee 摘 要 “孤獨論” 、“善惡論”和“階級衝突說”都不能全面揭示《人鼠之間》真正的主題意義。本文從這部小說標題的隱喻意義切入，闡釋了小說的主題意義，即人與鼠有著相同的命運，任何人也無法擺脫命運的 支配。 關鍵詞：主題意義； 隱喻意義；命運
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".