Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting: An Outcome Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. DESIGN: A surgeon's experience, by retrospective chart review, of 70 consecutive patients at a tertiary care centre. OUTCOME MEASURE: Periapical radiographs were taken at least six months after secondary alveolar bone grafting. The Enemark grading system was used to stratify graft-take. RESULTS: In unilateral clefts, 33% were level 1, 36% were level 2, 20% were level 3 and 11% were level 4. In bilateral clefts, 29% were level 1, 50% were level 2, 14% were level 3 and 7% were level 4. There was no statistically significant difference between the level of take and the type of cleft. Complications encountered were infection (n=3), fistula (n=3), pain (n=4) and bone graft exposure that led to failure (n=2). Two patients required reoperation for bone grafting. CONCLUSIONS: The iliac crest is a good donor site with excellent results and minimal morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it