Distributed lightpath control based on destination routing for wavelength-routed WDM networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies distributed lightpath control in wavelength-routed WDM networks. We propose to introduce a destination-routing mechanism for lightpath establishment, which uses global network state information for wavelength routing and allows the destination node of a lightpath to decide the route. The purpose is to use the most recent network state information to make a routing decision so that wavelength reservation failures can be minimized. Meanwhile, we also consider connection restoration in the occurrence of a link failure and introduce a destination-initiating mechanism that allows the destination node of a broken connection to initiate a connection restoration process. The purpose is to reduce the connection restoration time so that a backup path can be provisioned rapidly. Based on both mechanisms, we further propose an efficient distributed control protocol for lightpath establishment and restoration. The paper explicitly describes the major procedures of the protocol, discusses its significant properties, and evaluates its performance in terms of the request blocking probability, and the connection setup or restoration time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it