MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1942600544

Selective attention to sleep in heavy and light social drinkers

2008· article· en· W1942600544 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Heather Woods, Christopher‐James Harvey, Jason Ellis, Stephany M. Biello, Colin A. Espie

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéUniversity of South AustraliaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyEuropean CommissionNational Science FoundationCancer Research UKSanofiBristol-Myers SquibbHarvard University
KeywordsInsomniaPsychologyAutomaticityAlcohol consumptionStimulus (psychology)Sleep deprivationAudiologyAlcoholSleep (system call)Clinical psychologyPsychiatryDevelopmental psychologyCognitionMedicineCognitive psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Espie et al. (2006) propose a route into primary psychophysiological insomnia (PI) along the attention-intention-effort pathway which focuses on the inhibition of sleep-wake automaticity. A contributing factor to this is selective attention to sleep (alongside explicit intention to sleep and effort in the sleep engagement process). Previous research has established selective attention to sleep in PI by demonstrating altered attentional processing of sleep stimuli in PI compared to normal sleepers. With alcohol dependent individuals, who have also developed insomnia, having a 60% relapse rate compared to 30% in those without insomnia (Brower et al. 2001), understanding sleep in this population is relevant to both alcohol dependence research as well as research into development and maintenance of insomnia.
\n
\nMethod: An ICB flicker paradigm was employed to investigate
\nwhether selective attention to sleep was present along the alcohol consumption spectrum. A between subjects design was used to analyse responses of heavy (more than 20 units per week) and light (less than 10 units per week) social drinkers obtained from a computer task presenting images of sleep salient, alcohol salient and neutral images.
\n
\nResults: We found a significant effect of stimulus type (sleep, alcohol or neutral) but no main effect of alcohol consumption (heavy or light). A significant interaction was found between sleep (poor or normal) and alcohol consumption. On further analysis, it was found that those poor sleepers who consumed higher levels of alcohol were
\nsignificantly faster at identifying the sleep salient stimulus compared to poor sleepers who consumed lower amounts of alcohol.
\n
\nConclusion: This study suggests that poor sleepers who consume higher amounts of alcohol show an attentional bias towards sleep compared to normal sleepers, irrespective of alcohol consumption level, and poor sleepers who consume lower levels of alcohol. Further research is called for to understand the underlying mechanism behind the selective attention in this particular group and whether this effect is mediated by the individuals’ relationship with alcohol or sleep profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)Same topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207