Artificial frequency selective channel for covert cyclic delay diversity orthogonal frequency division multiplexing transmission
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multiple‐input multiple‐output orthogonal frequency division multiplexing has become an attractive air‐interface solution for the next generation wireless networks because of its high spectrum efficiency. This paper addresses the security concern and proposes to achieve covert orthogonal frequency division multiplexing transmission using cyclic delay diversity featured multiple‐input multiple‐output technology. Particularly, our physical layer security scheme takes the advantage of cyclic delay diversity formed periodical frequency selective channel and utilizes uneven comb pilots to confuse unauthorized receivers and benefit authorized receivers. We conduct simulation study to evaluate the impact of different cyclic delay, antenna number, and interpolation algorithms on our scheme. Numerical results show that our scheme can provide authorized users with significant advantage over eavesdroppers without complicated upper‐layer encryption and decryption. Moreover, the scheme has flexible choice of parameters and thus can be easily deployed in a variety of wireless networks with different requirements. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it