A new concept for encoding speech amplitude time quantization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For digital modulations applied to the coding of speech signals, a fixed sampling and transmission rate is always chosen. For commercial telephone these rates are respectively, 8 KHz and 64 Kbits/sec, corresponding to a filtered signal bandwidth of 300 to 3300 Hz. A new processing concept (variable sampling and digital quantization) is proposed where a sample is coded with a single binary word. The code word corresponds to an information pair: a variable and adaptive sampling time and a coding angle associated to the signal. The basic principle is conceived around a distribution of the coded samples in amplitude and time (amplitude-time coding) along an adaptive coding curve associated to each coded/decoded sample of the original signal. A variable sampling rate requires a buffer, thus a delay, for transmission at a fixed rate. The transmitted signal so obtained is a transposition of the original speech signal and consequently its characteristics (bandwith, amplitude dynamic range) are modified. Some of the characteristics of the transmitted signal are ultimately used for the digital or even the analog transmission of the signal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".