MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1945431098 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab69

69 PRODUCTION OF CLONED PIGS BY NUCLEAR TRANSFER OF PREADIPOCYTES

2004· article· en· W1945431098 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. Tomii, Mayuko Kurome, Hideto Ueda, Satoshi Ueno, K. Hiruma, Koichiro Kano, Hiroshi Nagashima

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsAndrologyBiologyStainingGametogenesisFlow cytometryApoptosisSomatic cell nuclear transferCell cycleCytochalasin BMolecular biologyChemistryCellBlastocystEmbryoCell biologyCryopreservationEmbryogenesisMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the first success in producing cloned pigs, donor cells have been limited to fetal fibroblasts and a few other cell types. The aim of the present study was to determine if porcine preadipocytes can be efficient donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) in pigs. Preadipocytes established from subcutaneous adipose tissue of a male adult pig were used as nuclear donor cells. Cell cycle synchronization was carried out by serum starvation (5 days), confluency (5 days), roscovitine treatment (15 µM, 2 days), or differentiation induction by 0.5 mM 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 0.25 µM dexamethasone, and 5 µg/mL insulin (5 days). Cell cycle synchronization and apoptosis of the donor cells were examined by flow cytometry and Annexin V staining and TUNEL. IVM oocytes were obtained from abattoir ovaries and matured in NCSU23. Donor cells were fused with the enucleated recipient oocytes by a single DC pulse of 200 V/mm for 10 µs in 0.28 M mannitol + 0.15 mM MgSO4. Reconstructed embryos were electrically activated at 1–1.5 h after the NT, followed by cytochalasin B treatment for 3 h. Development of the NT embryos was assessed by fixation/staining at 3 h after NT, culture for 7 days in NCSU23, and transfer to the oviducts of estrus-synchronized recipient gilts. The cells immediately entered the G0 phase by differentiation induction (92.5 ± 0.4%), with higher efficiency of synchronization than for the other methods (roscovitine: 80.3 ± 0.2%; confluency: 79.9 ± 0.3%, P < 0.05) except for serum starvation (89.8 ± 0.6%). The proportion of apoptotic cells in the differentiation group was significantly lower than the other groups (Annexin V: 7.7% vs. 15.7 to 19.3%, TUNEL: 8.3% vs. 12.8 to 14.0%, P < 0.05). Incidence of premature chromosome condensation following NT (88.0%) was as high as that observed after NT with fetal fibroblasts previously (data not shown). In vitro developmental rates of the NT embryos did not differ significantly among the cell cycle synchronization methods of the donor cells (7.2 to 10.8%). Cell number of the blastocysts was highest in the differentiation group (49.0 vs. 30.2 to 41.9, P < 0.05). Transfer of 1004 cloned embryos of the serum starvation group to 5 recipients resulted in the production of 4 live and 1 stillborn piglets from 1 recipient. Transfer of cloned embryos reconstructed of donor cells treated by differentiation induction is currently underway. These data demonstrate that preadipocytes collected from an adult pig are promising nuclear donor cells for pig cloning. This study was supported by PROBRAIN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207