MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae

2012· other· en· W1945566006 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard W. Jordan, Mitsunori Iwataki

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Life Sciences · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySensuTaxonFlagellateEcologyHabitatAlgaeBotanyGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Until recently, the chrysophytes were an algal group with mixed affinities and variable morphologies, united largely by their golden brown pigmentation. However, morphological and genetic studies have progressively removed many of the unaffiliated taxa, leaving two closely related classes, the Chrysophyceae sensu stricto and the Synurophyceae. Both the classes contain freshwater and marine species, although are considered more abundant and diverse in oligotrophic waters in terrestrial habitats. Cells may be solitary or colonial, having unequal flagella (heterokont), with flagellar swellings on one or both flagella acting as photoreceptors. Taxa covered by siliceous scales are present in both classes, although silicified bristles are only present in some synurophytes. Some chrysophytes may form cellulosic, chitinous, siliceous or calcareous loricae instead of possessing scales. All taxa from both classes produce resting stages known as stomatocysts, with some species forming them during both asexual and sexual phases. Since stomatocysts, and to a lesser extent scales and bristles, are preserved in the underlying sediments, their fossil record is relatively well known, with the oldest stomatocysts found in Early Cretaceous sediments. Fossil stomatocysts have proven very useful in palaeolimnological studies, particularly when reconstructing past nutrient levels, whereas their marine counterparts are a proxy for past sea‐ice distribution. Key Concepts: Genetic studies have shown that the Chrysophyceae sensu stricto and Synurophyceae are closely related, whereas the other taxa previously included in the Chrysophyceae sensu lato belong to different algal classes. Chrysophytes and synurophytes are heterokont algae, with a long ‘flimmer’ flagellum and a short ‘whiplash’ flagellum and with flagellar swellings on one or both flagella. Fucoxanthin is the main pigment responsible for their ‘golden brown’ colouration. Cells may possess silicified scales (but only synurophytes have bristles) produced by Golgi‐derived vesicles. Scale and bristle morphology appears to be species‐specific and is thus a key criterion in the identification of the taxa. Silicified resting stages bearing a plugged pore (stomatocysts) are unique to the Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae, and may also be species‐specific. Stomatocysts are often preserved in the underlying sediments, and have been used as palaeoenvironmental indicators. The oldest stomatocysts were found in Early Cretaceous marine sediments from the Southern Ocean, whereas the oldest silicified scales and bristles were found in Middle Eocene freshwater sediments from northwest Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Life SciencesSame topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207