MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1945783049 · doi:10.3749/canmin.47.1.107

EXSOLUTION MICROSTRUCTURES IN NH4-BEARING MUSCOVITE AND ANNITE IN GNEISSES FROM THE TORROX AREA, BETIC CORDILLERA, SPAIN

2009· article· en· W1945783049 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
María Dolores Ruiz Cruz, Carlos Sanz de Galdeano

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJunta de AndalucíaUniversidad de Granada
KeywordsMuscoviteGeologyGneissGeochemistryBearing (navigation)MineralogyGeographyPaleontologyMetamorphic rockQuartzCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variably sized lamellae of annite within muscovite crystals and lamellae of muscovite within annite crystals from gneissic rocks of the Torrox area in the Betic Cordillera, Spain, are interpreted as formed by exsolution of NH 4 -bearing micas present in the earliest metamorphic assemblage.The NH 4 -rich white mica, identified only in the overlying schists, was formed during the first diagenetic-to-metamorphic episode, with N derived from the maturation of organic matter.Initially contained in white mica, the NH 4 was redistributed between white mica and annite, probably at conditions of increasing metamorphism.In the current assemblage of gneisses, NH 4 is preferentially concentrated in annite, especially in the composite Ms+Ann grains.This assemblage, which consists of muscovite in homogeneous grains + muscovite in exsolved grains + annite in homogeneous grains + annite in exsolved grains, was probably derived from the lower-temperature four-mica assemblage: muscovite + NH 4 -rich white mica + annite + NH 4 -bearing annite.Exsolution as temperature increased explains the presence of NH 4 -rich micas in the overlying schists and the presence of exsolved grains in gneisses.The exsolution process occurred at ~450°C and ~3 kbar, physical conditions characterizing the first metamorphic episode affecting this formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207