MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nigeria: Analysing the Security Challenges of the Goodluck Jonathan Administration

2011· article· en· W1945851813 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adedoyin J. Omede

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Challenges and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolityPolitical scienceTerrorismAdministration (probate law)MilitantHuman securityIslamGovernment (linguistics)PoliticsCriminologyPublic administrationDevelopment economicsSociologyLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study is a critical analysis of the security challenges confronting the Goodluck Jonathan Administration in Nigeria. Since 2010, The Nigerian nation has on daily basis experience an upsurge of activities that threatens and endangers its national security. Kidnappings, arms proliferation, armed robberies, drug and human trafficking and violence associated with ethnic, religious and political conflicts are among these threats. Recently however, a new dimension of bomb blasts, occurring on a daily-basis, is a major focus of attention in Nigeria’s security analysis. The Boko-Haram Islamic militant sect (literarily translated as Western education is bad)., has been fingered as the perpetrators of the bomb explosions. In view of this scenario, the study examines the impact of these occurrences on Nigeria’s security as well as, examines the responses of government taking into cognizance the public and media reactions to such actions. Finally, the study posited that the impact of the blasts on the people and the polity are ominous and that, there is a higher degree of fear and insecurity. Based on the palpable tension threatening to shatter the fragile thread that binds the people together, the study further made some recommendations on how peace and stability can endure in the country. Key words: Militant groups; Insecurity; Destruction; Corruption; Instability; Terrorism and ethno-religious crisis Resume L'etude est une analyse critique de la securite defis auxquels l'administration Goodluck Jonathan au Nigeria. Depuis 2010, la Nation Nigeriane a quotidiennement l'experience d'un regain d'activites qui menace et met en danger sa securite nationale. Les enlevements, la proliferation des armes, vols a main armee, de drogue et d'etres humains et la violence associee aux conflits ethniques, religieuses et politiques sont parmi ces menaces. Recemment, toutefois, une nouvelle dimension d'explosions de bombes, se produisant sur une base quotidienne-, est une preoccupation majeure dans l'analyse de la securite du Nigeria. Le Boko Haram secte islamiste (litteralement traduit comme l'education occidentale est mauvaise), a ete pointe du doigt comme etant les auteurs des attentats a la bombe. Compte tenu de ce scenario, l'etude examine l'impact de ces evenements sur la securite du Nigeria ainsi que, examine les reponses du gouvernement en prenant en connaitre les reactions du public et des medias a de telles actions. Enfin, l'etude postule que l'impact des explosions sur le peuple et la politique sont inquietantes et que, il ya un degre eleve de crainte et d'insecurite. Base sur la tension palpable menacant de briser le fil fragile qui lie les gens ensemble, l'etude a fait quelques recommandations sur la facon dont la paix et la stabilite peuvent endurer dans le pays. Mots cles: Groupes militants; Insecurite; Destruction; Corruption; Instabilite; Terrorisme et la Crise Ethno-Religieuse

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicEducational Challenges and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207