Novel genomic insertion–deletion in <i>MLH1</i>: possible mechanistic role for non‐homologous end‐joining DNA repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an inherited cancer syndrome caused by a defect in the mismatch repair pathway. The majority of HNPCC mutations have been detected in MLH1 and MSH2. Most reported mutations are substitutions, small insertions and deletions, but standard methods of mutation analysis do not detect large rearrangements. It is now established that large deletions, insertions and rearrangements account for a significant proportion of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations. We report an unusual rearrangement resulting in the deletion of exons 6, 7 and 8 of MLH1, with the retention of part of intron 6 and insertions of two nucleotides each flanking the retained sequence. The 349-bp-retained sequence is made up of two closely spaced Alu sequences. The mutation was initially detected by protein truncation test and cDNA sequencing. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification confirmed the deletion of three exons. PCR and sequencing were used to characterize the breakpoint. Despite the high density of Alu elements in MLH1, there is no homology at the deletion breakpoints or insertion junctions in this case to suggest that homologous recombination has occurred. We propose a mechanism involving non-homologous end joining to explain the occurrence of this complex deletion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".