MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1947240152 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2014-0337

Geomechanical safety assessment for transversely isotropic rock mass subjected to deep mining operations

2015· article· en· W1947240152 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
W. Pytel, Bogumiła Pałac-Walko

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRock mass classificationGeologyMining engineeringOverburdenGeotechnical engineeringGeological Strength Index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The largest risk for mining operations conducted within the Legnica–Głogów Copper Basin is created mostly by high-energy tremors, the hypocenters of which are located within the main roof strata composed of sedimentary-type rocks — mainly dolomite and anhydrite — about 40–200 m above the excavated copper ore body. These categories of rock clearly exhibit anisotropic strength–deformation characteristics that may significantly affect the safety level value represented by the appropriate safety margin (or safety factor) based on an adequate strength hypothesis. As the focal mechanism most often encountered in such tremors is a slipping-type mechanism with a rupture plane, typically the Mohr–Coulomb theory of strength is applied for a safety level assessment in Polish copper mines. It has been assumed, however, that strength theories based on anisotropic failure criteria should serve as better indicators of correlation between observed and well-characterized sedimentary rock strata failure mechanisms and the location of concentrated areas of the negative values of margin of safety within the rock mass. As changing levels of stress in the rock mass during the mining process may be tracked effectively using solutions offered by appropriate three-dimensional geomechanical models (e.g., finite element method), the assessment of these changes due to mining-face progress is also possible in the location where the seismic tremor occurred. This assessment is characterized by its focal mechanism using the appropriate geophysical methods that permit finding such geomechanical conditions, engaging also the rock mass’ strain–stress states and the material anisotropic characteristics. On the basis of the long-term path of rock mass loading — due to mining predicted by numerical modeling — this could indicate the necessary conditions that should be fulfilled if the anticipated methods of the geophysics failure mechanism could be developed. This is particularly important for anisotropic rock structures. The proposed approach is illustrated using an example of a strong seismic energy event of 0.22 GJ that occurred in 2005 in an area of the Rudna mine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207