MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1947347020 · doi:10.3382/ps/pev135

Using near infrared transmittance to generate sorted fractions of Fusarium-infected wheat and the impact on broiler performance

2015· article· en· W1947347020 on OpenAlexaff
Michael E. Kautzman, Mark Wickstrom, Natacha Hogan, Tom A. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNorth Dakota State University
KeywordsMycotoxinFusariumBroilerFood scienceBiologyAnimal scienceVomitoxinVeterinary medicineHorticultureZearalenone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of naturally contaminated Fusarium wheat containing deoxynivalenol (DON) on growth and performance of broiler chickens from 0 to 35 d. The BoMill TriQ individual kernel sorting technology uses near infrared transmittance (NIT) spectra to separate Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK) from healthy kernels based on individual kernel CP. Three Fusarium-contaminated wheat sources were individually sorted into 3 test fractions: outlier (10% of the source), high mycotoxin (20% of the source), and low mycotoxin (70% of the source). These fractions were reconstituted into 4 ratios-M0, M20, M40, and M60-relating to the proportion of the high mycotoxin fraction in the reconstituted diets. These 12 reconstituted wheat sources with varying levels of DON were incorporated at ∼70% (starter) or ∼75% (grower/finisher) into diets. The fractions of wheat used had FDK ranging from 0.1 to 25.8% and DON from 0.0 to 14.3 ppm. A total of 480 newly hatched Ross 308 male broilers were randomly divided into 96 cages. Each test diet was assigned to 8 replicates with 5 birds per replicate cage. At 21 d, 180 birds were transferred to 36 cages, allowing 3 replicates of 5 birds per diet until 35 d. A factorial arrangement analysis compared the 3 wheat sources and 4 ratios produced from each sorted wheat. Growth and performance were evaluated as BW (g), feed intake (FI; g/bird/day), feed conversion ratio (FCR; g:g), AME (kcal ME/kg diet), nitrogen retention (NR; %), and mortality (%) for 0 to 21 d and 21 to 35 d. Results indicate no significant difference in BW, FI, and FCR (P > 0.05). Significant differences were seen in AME and NR (P < 0.01). This study demonstrates the potential of this novel sorting technology to produce naturally contaminated diets with a large range of mycotoxin concentrations from a single wheat source to enable future investigations of mycotoxin exposure in any species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207