MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Regulation of p53 mRNA by AMP Kinase (AMPK) activation in C2C12 myoblasts

2010· article· en· W194770097 on OpenAlexafffund
Ayesha Saleem, Michael Shuen, David A. Hood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAMPKC2C12ChemistryMessenger RNALuciferaseUntranslated regionMitochondrial biogenesisCell biologyMyocyteTransfectionThree prime untranslated regionMolecular biologyMitochondrionKinaseProtein kinase ABiologyBiochemistryGeneMyogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

p53 protein is important for basal and exercise‐induced mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle. As shown previously, pifithrin‐α (15 μM) a specific inhibitor of p53, reduced the AICAR‐induced increase in mitochondrial content in myoblasts. This demonstrates that p53 partly mediates AMPK‐induced mitochondrial adaptations. Here, we investigated whether p53 mRNA content and stability were modulated by AMPK. Two transcript variants (TV) of murine p53 have been discovered. p53 TV2 mRNA was expressed at 60% lower levels than p53 TV1 in C2C12 myoblasts. AICAR treatment (3 days) reduced p53 TV1 and TV2 mRNA levels by 28% and 13%, respectively, compared to control. To investigate whether this reduced mRNA was due to changes in mRNA stability, we generated reporter constructs containing the full length (R2) 3′untranslated region (UTR), or a shorter construct without the AU‐rich region and the poly‐adenylation signal (R1) of p53 TV2 mRNA. Following transfection, luciferase activity of both R1 and R2 was only ~15% of control, indicating that even the shorter 3′UTR could mediate p53 mRNA decay. AICAR treatment further decreased luciferase activity of both constructs by ~35% compared to untreated cells. This suggests that AMPK regulates p53 by reducing mRNA stability and content. Our findings shed light on the complexity of p53 regulation and have significance for p53‐based therapeutic interventions. (Funded by NSERC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207