MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1948257669 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35572

An engineered biocompatible drug delivery system enhances nerve regeneration after delayed repair

2015· article· en· W1948257669 on OpenAlexafffund
Kasra Tajdaran, Tessa Gordon, Matthew D. Wood, Molly S. Shoichet, Gregory H. Borschel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGlial cell line-derived neurotrophic factorIn vivoRegeneration (biology)Drug deliveryPLGABiocompatibilityIn vitroFibrinNeurotrophic factorsViability assayPharmacologyNerve injuryMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringMedicineChemistryCell biologyBiologyBiochemistrySurgeryImmunologyNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Localized drug delivery strategies could greatly benefit patients with peripheral nerve injury and could be easy for surgeons to implement. We developed a local drug delivery system (DDS) using drug-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres (MS) embedded in a fibrin gel. In an in vitro study, we investigated the biocompatibility of this DDS by performing a toxicity assay in which we incubated PC-12 cells with the medium released from the DDS in vitro. In an in vivo study, this DDS was applied at the rat common peroneal (CP) nerve injury site to deliver exogenous glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) to the regenerating axons after delayed nerve repair. In vitro, PC-12 cells incubated with released media samples from the DDS had similar viability to control cells cultured with normal media, demonstrating that the DDS was not toxic. In vivo, the numbers of motor and sensory neurons that regenerated their axons with empty MS treatment were the same as when there was no MS treatment. The DDS increased the numbers of regenerating motor- and sensory neurons to levels indistinguishable from those observed with immediate nerve repair. The DDS increased neuron regeneration to levels double those observed with negative control groups. This biocompatible, nontoxic, fibrin gel-based DDS enhances outcomes following severe peripheral nerve injuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part ASame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207