Hydromorphological implications of local tributary widening for river rehabilitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hydromorphological implications of the local widening of a tributary where it enters a confluence were investigated in a laboratory setting that is representative of the 20 major confluences on the channelized Upper Rhone River. Although local tributary widening reduces the confluence angle, it amplifies the hydromorphosedimentary processes in the confluence hydrodynamic zone (CHZ), because local widening reduces the effective flow area, causing increased tributary velocities and momentum flux. The reduction in effective flow area is caused by an increase in bed elevation and by lateral constriction of the flow induced by flow stagnation at the upstream corner of the confluence. The increased tributary velocities amplify the two‐layer flow structure in the CHZ. Flow originating from the tributary is confined to the upper part of the water column and is more markedly directed outward than flow in the lower part of the water column originating from the main channel. A shear layer characterized by increased turbulence activity develops at the interface between the two flow layers. The increased tributary velocities enhance bed discordance, the penetration of the tributary into the CHZ and the channel bed gradients in the postconfluence channel. The results indicate that local tributary widening can enhance heterogeneity in sediment substrate, flow velocities and flow depths. Widening may therefore enhance local habitat and improve the connectivity of the tributary to the main river network. This may, in turn, provide favorable conditions for the improvement and reestablishment of ecological river functions, without having adverse impact on flood safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".