MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1949799299 · doi:10.1101/pdb.prot086280

Detection of p62 on Paraffin Sections by Immunohistochemistry

2015· article· en· W1949799299 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alexander Watson, Elizabeth J. Soilleux

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Protocols · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTata TrustsLady Tata Memorial Trust
KeywordsSequestosome 1AutophagyAutophagosomeWestern blotImmunohistochemistrySignal transducing adaptor proteinCell biologyProtein aggregationBlotChemistryBiologyBiochemistryGenePhosphorylationApoptosisImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of autophagy in human disease is a rapidly expanding field. Diagnostic paraffin sections of a variety of patient tissues, including bone marrow, are available to researchers-yet are unsuitable for traditional autophagy quantification methods such as western blot or electron microscopy. This protocol outlines the immunohistochemical detection of the protein p62 (sequestosome-1, encoded by the gene SQSTM1)-an indicator of autophagic degradative activity-in slide-mounted paraffin sections such as bone marrow samples cut by a trephine. The p62 protein is an autophagic cargo adaptor, capable of binding to ubiquitylated proteins as well as autophagosome membrane proteins (LC3B and GABA(A) receptor-associated protein [GABARAP] family members) and hypothesized thus to target protein aggregates for lysosomal degradation. p62 itself is degraded by autophagy, remaining at low levels when autophagy is induced, and has been shown to accumulate when autophagy is deficient. Qualitative assessment and comparison of p62 staining between healthy and disease sections or disease subtypes will help target further investigation into the potential roles for autophagy in a variety of disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCold Spring Harbor ProtocolsSame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207