MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1950258741 · doi:10.1002/dta.365

Development of liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry‐based analytical assays for the determination of HIF stabilizers in preventive doping research

2011· article· en· W1950258741 on OpenAlex
Simon Beuck, Wolfgang Bornatsch, Andreas Lagojda, Wilhelm Schänzer, Mario Thevis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Testing and Analysis · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Anti-Doping Agency
KeywordsChemistryMetaboliteChromatographyTandem mass spectrometryMass spectrometryHydroxylationAcetic acidOrganic chemistryBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) stabilizers increase blood haemoglobin levels after oral administration and their use in sports was recently banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency. For the support of analytical assay development, the metabolic fate of two model HIF stabilizers, based on the isoquinoline-3-carboxamide scaffold of the lead drug candidate FG-2216, was assessed by in vitro methods. The analytes were identified and characterized by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in positive and negative ionization mode using an API 4000 Qtrap as well as an exactive high resolution-high accuracy MS. The model HIF stabilizer N-[(1-chloro-4-hydroxy-7-isopropoxy-isoquinolin-3-carbonyl)-amino]-acetic acid (1), was converted into 3 major phase I metabolites by hydroxylation, dealkylation, and dehydrogenation. The structures of the hydroxylated and the dealkylated metabolites were confirmed by LC-coupled nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Moreover, glucuronic acid conjugates of the active drug and one of the dealkylated phase I metabolite were identified. Hydroxylation of model compound 2 (N-[(1-chloro-4-hydroxy-isoquinolin-3-carbonyl)-amino]-acetic acid) yielded two metabolites, regioisomeric to the dealkylated product of 1. Mass spectral data of compounds 1 and 2, as well as a structure-related analogue were included into a multi-target analytical assay based on direct injection and LC-MS/MS analysis of human urine. The method was validated for quantitative purposes. In an approach of preventive doping research, more comprehensive screening methods applying precursor ion (m/z 166) and neutral loss (-10 Da) scans were developed, allowing for the detection of unknown metabolites and structurally analogous HIF stabilizers emerging from ongoing lead structure developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it