MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ASSESSMENT OF EARLY OSTEOARTHRITIS IN HIP DYSPLASIA WITH DELAYED GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF CARTILAGE

2003· article· en· W1950451359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineOsteoarthritisCartilageRadiographyHip dysplasiaGadoliniumWOMACNuclear medicineFemoral headDysplasiaRadiologyIntraclass correlationSurgeryAnatomyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of surgical and medical treatment of osteoarthritis is difficult to assess because of the lack of a noninvasive, sensitive measure of cartilage integrity. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) was designed to specifically examine glycosaminoglycan changes in articular cartilage that occur during the development of osteoarthritis. Our primary goal was to compare this technique with measurement of the joint space width on conventional radiographs in patients with hip dysplasia. We performed this comparison by assessing the correlation between the findings of each technique and clinically important factors such as pain, severity of dysplasia, and age. METHODS: Sixty-eight hips in forty-three patients were included in the study. Clinical symptoms were assessed with use of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire. The width of the joint space as well as the lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg (as a measure of the severity of the dysplasia) was measured on standard standing radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging maps of glycosaminoglycan distribution were made with T1-calculated images after administration of gadopentetate (2-) (Gd-DTPA (2-) ). The dGEMRIC index was calculated as the average of the T1 values for the acetabular and femoral head cartilages. RESULTS: The dGEMRIC index correlated with both pain (rs = -0.50, p < 0.0001) and the lateral center-edge angle (rs = 0.52, p < 0.0001), whereas the joint space width did not correlate with either, with the numbers available. There was a correlation between the dGEMRIC index and pain whether or not a labral tear was present. The dGEMRIC index was significantly different (p < 0.0001) among three groups of hips classified according to whether they had mild, moderate, or severe dysplasia, whereas the joint space width did not differ significantly among these three groups. There was no significant correlation between age and any of the other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that, in patients with hip dysplasia, the dGEMRIC index-a measure of the biochemical integrity of cartilage-correlates with pain and the severity of the dysplasia and is significantly different among groups of hips with mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia, suggesting that it may be a sensitive measure of early osteoarthritis. Additional studies are needed to determine whether dGEMRIC can be used to predict disease progression in different situations and/or demonstrate responses to therapeutic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it